Pages

Showing posts with label Arizona Republic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arizona Republic. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Arizona Republic publishes letter by Richard Grayson, "No Labels or Arizona Independent Party − it’s all branding"

Today, Tuesday, March 3, 2026, the Arizona Republic published a letter by Richard Grayson, "No Labels or Arizona Independent Party − it’s all branding":

Senate Bill 1609 would require the Arizona Independent Party to revert to its previous name, the No Labels Party — the name under which thousands of Arizonans signed a 2023 petition to establish it. That is the practical effect of this bill.The measure does not remove the party from the ballot. It does not raise signature requirements. It does not prevent anyone from registering with the party or running under its banner. Candidates affiliated with it will still face far lower signature thresholds than candidates who run as true independents and bypass party primaries altogether. An unopposed write-in candidate can still win a party nomination with only a plurality of votes.

As a candidate who ran under the No Labels banner, I can attest that the party's ballot access advantages existed before the name change and will remain after it.

Renaming the party “Independent” did not create independence, and restoring the original name will not diminish it. What changes here is branding — not democracy.

Richard Grayson, Apache Junction

Sunday, August 10, 2025

Richard Grayson Letter Opposing Changing No Labels Party's Name in Arizona Republic

Today, Sunday, August 10, 2025, The Arizona Republic published a letter by Richard Grayson opposing the proposed name change for the Arizona No Labels Party.

Different titles appeared on the versions at AZCentral.com and Yahoo News..

Ballot Access News also had a story by Richard Winger on Grayson's opposition to the proposed name change.

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

Arizona Republic Article on Arizona No Labels Party Lawsuit Quotes Richard Grayson

Today, Wednesday, October 25, 20123, the Arizona Republic published an article by Ray Stern, "Adrian Fontes, No Labels Party spar over candidates using party name. Here's the latest," that mentions Richard Grayson as one of the No Labels Party candidates targeted by the legal action:

Two Arizonans filed statements of interest to run under the No Labels label over the summer: U.S. Senate candidate Tyson Draper and state Corporation Commission candidate Richard Grayson, the latter a progressive Democrat who previously told The Arizona Republic he's trying to undermine the new party.
Draper, a high school coach who runs a conservative news site, responded to a request for comment by The Arizona Republic by saying: "go f*** yourself."
Following the second candidate's filing in August, the Washington D.C.-based political party sent a letter to Fontes' office saying it "does not desire to have the names of candidates for any other office printed on the official general-election ballot at the 2024 general election."
Arizona Elections Director Colleen Connor last month responded that the state would keep accepting candidate statements of interest and nominating petitions "for any eligible voter who seeks to use No Labels' ballot line in the 2024 election."
Grayson pointed out that if the party succeeds in banning unauthorized No Labels candidates, the people registered to vote under No Labels wouldn't get to participate in August's primary election at all.
Voters tired of the two-party system would be "better off registering as an independent," which would allow them to choose which party's ballot they want in the primary, he said.

A version of the article appeared in the print edition of the Arizona Republic on pages 1B and 2B on Sunday, October 29, 2023.


Friday, September 29, 2023

Arizona Republic Article on No Labels Party Mentions Richard Grayson's Candidacy

Today, September 29, 2023, The Arizona Republic website published "No Labels can't stop candidates and a primary election it doesn't want," a column by Abe Kwok that mentions Richard Grayson's efforts to become an anti-No Labels Arizona No Labels Party candidate:

Arizona statute says, “A new political party may become eligible for recognition and shall be represented by an official party ballot at the next ensuing regular primary election.” The operative word being “shall.”
Beyond that, nothing stops someone who is registered with a political party from gathering sufficient nomination signatures to qualify the party’s primary election. The threshold is even easier for new political parties, requiring fewer signatures.
And the threshold is virtually nonexistent for someone like Richard Grayson, one of the two people whom No Labels is trying to block. Grayson, a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat and perennial candidate who describes his candidacy as performance art, plans on running as a write-in candidate.
He said he’s running chiefly to be a thorn in the side of No Labels, whose leadership he believes is helping former President Donald Trump get elected by siphoning votes away from President Joe Biden.
His plan is honed:
• Wait until the deadline for submitting signatures;
• See who qualifies for the ballot;
• Look for an office in which there’s no qualified Democratic candidate;
• and notify the Secretary of State’s Office of his plans to run as a write-in.
His name, along with those of other verified write-in candidates, will be made available on the web and at polling sites come election time. He only needs a few votes to advance. State law requires a plurality of the votes cast for the office. It could be one vote, theoretically.
Grayson has won three Arizona primaries by way of the wr‪ite-in route — twice under the Green Party and once under Americans Elect — with as few as two votes.
Even if not a single person qualifies as a No Labels candidate, everyone registered with No Labels gets a blank ballot (with only a listing of offices up for election) for the August 2024 state primary. And Grayson — unless challenged by another write-in for that yet-to-be-determined office — will represent No Labels.
Party support or not.

 

The column appered in the print Arizona Republic on Saturday, October 7, 2023.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Arizona Republic Covers Richard Grayson's Fundraising in Campaign to Replace Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona's 8th Congressional District


The front page of today's Valley and State section of The Arizona Republic has a story on fundraising among candidates in the special election in Arizona's Eighth Congressional District for the seat formerly held by Gabrielle Giffords.

The article began:
Ron Barber, the Democratic congressional aide who was wounded alongside former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in last year's shooting rampage, has raised more than double the money raised by each of three of the Republicans competing for her House seat, records show.

Campaign-finance reports were not available for a fourth Republican candidate, state Sen. Frank Antenori.

Figures were also unavailable for Green Party candidate Richard Grayson.

The fundraising numbers may take on outsized importance in the highly compressed time frame for selecting a replacement to serve the remainder of Giffords' term.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Richard Grayson Ties for Third Place with 6.96% of the Vote in 2012 Arizona Green Party Presidential Preference Primary


We tied for third place, with 6.96% of the vote, in yesterday's Arizona Green Party presidential preference primary. But we had 39 votes, and the second-place finisher had only 50 votes, so we weren't far behind. We finished second in four counties: Pima (Tucson), Pinal (our home county), Mohave and Navajo, and we tied for second in a fifth county, Cochise. In three Arizona counties -- La Paz, Santa Cruz and Greenlee -- we finished in a six-way tie for first place, or last place, since none of the Green Party candidates got any votes at all.

We carried our hometown, Apache Junction, and apparently the Navajo Nation as well. In a majority of Arizona counties (8 out of 15), we did no worse than second place. Here is the end of today's front-page story in The Arizona Republic, which was of course mostly about Mitt Romney's win in the Republican primary:

Although Republican politics dominated the day, six Green Party candidates also appeared on Arizona's primary ballot. Jill Stein, a physician who has run for statewide office several times in Massachusetts, jumped out to an early lead, far outpolling the other candidate with a national organization, Kent Mesplay, who is an air- quality inspector from San Diego County.

Two other nationally prominent candidates did not make it on Arizona's ballot: Harley Mikkelson, a retired government employee from Michigan, and comedian Roseanne Barr.

Richard Grayson, a familiar face in the Arizona Green Party, appeared on the ballot, but he released a statement last month that he would act as a stand-in for Barr and ask that votes he receives be given to her at the national convention this July in Baltimore.

Two other Arizonans, Gerard Davis and Michael Oatman, along with Gary Swing, who is also a candidate for Congress in Colorado, trailed in votes.

This is an early report from reporter Suzanne Adams' story in the Kingman Daily Miner in Mohave County, where we got 25% of the vote, our second-best showing:

According to unofficial election results, Romney got 39 percent and Santorum got 31 percent of 15,070 Mohave County Republican voters. Newt Gingrich came in third with 21 percent of the vote and Ron Paul received 9 percent.

Romney won Arizona by a slightly larger margin - 47 percent of state Republicans voted for Romney and 27 percent voted for Rick Santorum. Gingrich also came in third in the state with 16 percent, followed by Paul with 9 percent.

In the race for the Green Party nomination Stein got five of the votes from eight Mohave County Green Party members who participated Tuesday. Richard Grayson came in second with 2 votes and Michael Oatman came in third with one vote.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Arizona Republic article discusses Richard Grayson's Green Party campaign for Congress in AZ-06


Today's Arizona Republic has an article that discusses our campaign for Congress in Arizona's Sixth Congressional District. Relevant portions highlighted:

Green Party is opposing 12 primary
write-in hopefuls

by Mary Jo Pitzl



Green Party candidates who won their party's primary last week say they don't want to be confused with a slate of write-in candidates being dismissed as "sham" candidates.

The Green Party is actively opposing 12 write-in candidates from last week's ballot. They include candidates for secretary of state and treasurer as well as seven legislative candidates. These candidates switched their party registration just before the filing deadline for the primary and have been called out by the Arizona Democratic Party in a complaint seeking a voter-fraud investigation. Many of the candidates were Republicans until mid-July; one was a Democrat, another was a Libertarian and two others were not registered.


Democrats argue that the candidates are not standard-bearers for the Green Party and could attract the support of Democrat-leaning voters.

"We strongly advise all registered Arizona voters to not waste their votes on these individuals," party co-chairman Claudia Ellquist wrote on the Green Party's blog.

But the party has backed a slate of candidates, including Leonard Clark, who won a spot on the Congressional District 5 ballot as a write-in candidate.

Clark said he switched his voter registration from Democrat to Green at the beginning of the year, disenchanted with the Democratic Party, and does not want to be confused with the so-called "sham" candidates.

Richard Grayson, a write-in candidate for Congressional District 6, might still win the Green Party's seal of approval. Party officials said they vetted him but decided to withhold an endorsement decision until they see if he qualifies for the Nov. 2 election. It took only one vote to qualify, under a provision of Arizona election law, so if Grayson voted for himself, his name will be on the November ballot. Candidates are not certified for the general-election ballot until the state does its canvass Tuesday.

The Arizona Republican Party ridiculed the Democrats' request, claiming the party is trying to limit voter choice.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Arizona Republic feature article on Richard Grayson's candidacy in the Arizona Democratic presidential preference primary


There is a feature story in the Arizona Republic today (Tuesday, January 29, 2008) about Richard Grayson and other candidates running in Arizona's Super Tuesday Democratic presidential preference primary:

Arizona makes it easy to run for president; just ask Doctress Neutopia

Richard Ruelas
The Arizona Republic


Arizona voters will face a daunting ballot on Super Tuesday. The challenge with the state's presidential preference election won't be choosing a candidate, but finding a candidate.

The Democratic and Republican ballots are stacked with 24 names each. Barack Obama, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Mitt Romney and other recognizable names are there. But so is Sean "CF" Murphy, who gives his address as "one stone's throw from the Rillito River," and Libby Hubbard, whose first name will be listed on the ballot as "Doctress Neutopia."

It doesn't take much to get on the Arizona ballot. Print your name and address on a nomination form, sign it in front of a notary, mail the form in and you're on. You don't have to live in Arizona. You don't even have to be registered to vote.

The lax rules result in a few ambitious candidates getting themselves listed. Some are serious. Others just want to see their names alongside well-known candidates.

This year, the Tucson Weekly, an alternative newspaper, added to the confusion with "Project White House." It solicited readers to run for president and blog about the experience. It also offered to notarize the candidate forms for free. (Then again, the Secretary of State's Office will perform that same function for anyone who asks.)

That's why Jan Brewer, the holder of that office and the woman charged with running the state's elections, would like to see the Legislature adopt new rules to qualify for the ballot.

"This is something we should all take very seriously," she said. "By enabling people to get their names on the ballot just for the glory of it, it sort of circumvents the seriousness of the serious candidates that have campaigned and have issues and policies."

Brewer said it's not her job to figure out who is serious and who is joking.

The two candidates from metropolitan Phoenix illustrate the dilemma. One, Michael P. Shaw, a Republican from Glendale, has a stack of policy ideas, has made campaign trips (including to Iowa) and fervently believes in his chances of winning. Another, Richard Grayson, a Democrat from Apache Junction, is running as a joke, concurrent with his nearly non-existent campaign for Congress.


Michael P. Shaw

There is no use discussing the long odds or nearly improbable scenarios it would take for Shaw to become the next president of the United States. He knows the fight he's facing, and he isn't backing down.

"Defeat is not acceptable," Shaw said. The 36-year-old son of a minister is leaving his fate in the hands of God. "He has something he will pull out of his sleeve. You can doubt me, but don't doubt the God of Israel."

Shaw, a truck driver and former security guard, actually showed up for the drawing that determined the candidate's ballot order. Dressed in a "Geek Squad" shirt from the Best Buy electronics stores, he drew No. 6, then made a "W" with his fingers, and declared he was representing the west side.

Shaw said he believes his street credentials will help him in international affairs and in the upcoming debates, if he's invited.

"I'm from the gutter. I'm from the 'hood," he said. "Those men up there on the stage don't scare me."

Shaw said that after he got himself on the ballot, he started taking his chances of getting elected seriously.

He took a Greyhound bus to Iowa to try to drum up support in the caucus. The trip took longer than he thought it would, costing him time. He blames the bus company for his defeat there.

With no time to get his name in front of the masses necessary for victory, Shaw volunteered to help out Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., courting votes in the 'hoods of Iowa.

"Those few votes pushed (Obama) over," Shaw said. "I take full responsibility for the victory in Iowa for Obama."

Shaw said he has always been interested in politics, but became truly awakened after hearing the Rush Limbaugh radio program.

"I'm bringing Reaganomics back from the dead," he said, referring to the economic program of President Reagan. Shaw also wants to bring the man himself back, claiming the technology exists to create a virtual clone of the former president.

Shaw claims support from both the immigrant community and gangs from his former home cities in California and Illinois. Shaw said that if he can get enough people motivated to support him, he could start leveraging that support with Obama, possibly creating a Shaw/Obama ticket.

In the meantime, Shaw said he campaigns every day along 59th Avenue in Glendale. He also solicits donations online. "Let the people know the man needs donations," he said.

Shaw hopes to raise enough to travel the country in an 18-wheeler, which he hopes someone will donate.

"Obama wouldn't be nothing without money," Shaw said. "McCain wouldn't be nothing without money. I need the same thing they need."

Richard Grayson

Richard Grayson said he filed to run for president of the United States by mistake and worried that the mix-up will distract voters from his nearly non-existent run for Congress.

"I'm a terrible candidate," he said.

Grayson said he's running as a Democrat against Republican Rep. Jeff Flake in an attempt to get somebody better to run.

"There's been no (Democrat) running in this district since 2002, and frankly, I'm getting annoyed that I can't vote for a Democrat," he said.

Grayson said the state Democratic Party essentially has written off the Sixth District because it has such a high Republican registration rate. "It's an impossible district for a Democrat," Grayson said. "Unless (the Republican) like murdered his wife the week before, but even then, the early voting would probably get him in."

Grayson, an author and college professor who splits his time among Brooklyn, Apache Junction and Florida, has run for office several times.

His political career began in 1979 when he ran for vice president even though, constitutionally, he was too young to hold the office.

He ran for town council of Davie, Fla., in 1980, advocating that horses should get the right to vote. In 1993, he ran for Congress in Florida. In 2000, he ran for U.S. senator. He didn't win any of those elections. Not even close.

But Grayson, an author of short-story collections that have garnered favorable reviews, sees running for office as a way to make political points. His presidential run was designed to show that it's easier to get on that ballot than it is to become a candidate for Congress.

"It's kind of ridiculous that it's so easy," he said.

Now that his point is made - and he has garnered a bit of publicity - Grayson said seeing his name on the Democratic side of the ballot does not fill him with pride.

"Frankly, I feel kind of stupid," he said. "It's kind of embarrassing. I don't tell many people."

Tuesday, December 26, 2000

Richard Grayson column in Arizona Republic: "Bronzes Are 'White' Only"


Richard Grayson has a column in the Arizona Republic today (: "Bronzes Are 'White' Only," about the lack of racial diversity in J. Seward Johnson's statues on display in downtown Mesa.

Sunday, November 5, 2000

Arizona Republic features Richard Grayson's State Lines column, "On Living Where There's No There"


The Arizona Republic today (Sunday, November 5, 2000) features a State Lines column by Richard Grayson, "On Living Where There's No There."


ON LIVING WHERE THERE'S NO THERE THERE

By Richard Grayson



A few weeks after moving to Arizona last spring, I was sitting in the café of a Valley megabookstore, staring out the window at the multiscreen theater and big-box stores on the other side of the shopping center. About to drive home, I fretted about the heavy traffic I'd be facing on the Florida Turnpike.

Then I noticed the mountains.

Shaken, I realized I was in the Ahwatukee Foothills and not in Boca Raton.

Less than a year away from official AARP-dom, I had just experienced my first "senior moment."

Upon further reflection, however, I recognized that my mistake was quite natural, considering I was in a "power center" which almost exactly resembled one I frequented near my former home in South Florida - down to the layout of the Barnes & Noble and the number of theaters (24) with stadium seating in the AMC megaplex.

Actually, everything was pretty much the same as in other shopping centers I'd been to in recent years, from Saratoga, Calif. and Garden City, N.Y. to Billings, Mont. and Willow Grove, Pa. Oh sure, the misters cooling off outdoor diners at the trendy restaurants should have clued me in as to the desert locale, but the slight variation from the norm only seemed to emphasize the similarity.

That was the moment I knew Arizona was home.

Be it ever so humble, there's no place like every other place.

I live in a garden apartment in Mesa, just off the Superstition Freeway at Dobson Road. It is very similar to the garden apartment I lived in last year in Davie, Fla., just off an exit of Interstate 595. As in Florida, my "rental community" here has swimming pools, a tennis court and a clubhouse. Nearby are subdivisions of "executive homes" on cul-de-sacs and artificial lakes. Palm trees line the wide, traffic-clogged streets. My day-to-day environment is essentially identical to the one I experienced 2,300 miles away: a suburban neighborhood whose density has made it de facto urban. There's a bus stop nearby to use in case my car breaks down, and a Starbucks is literally our next-door neighbor. I live amid the stucco and concrete of what architecture critic Melvin Webber, describing emerging metro areas of the West, has called a "non-place urban realm."

I can walk to the same supermarket (Albertsons) and bank (Bank of America) as I could in my former suburban Fort Lauderdale neighborhood. I'm still within a five-minute drive of a regional mall, golf course, library, park, and dozens of strip malls - though I must admit that in Florida I did live a lot closer to the local branch of the University of Phoenix.

If I'm in need of "shoppertainment" in the form of outlet stores, video arcades, foreign tourists, mall TV and dining amid mechanical denizens of the rain forest, I can take myself to nearby Arizona Mills, a carbon copy of the Sawgrass Mills by my old stamping grounds.

In Scottsdale I can use my Neiman-Marcus credit card and find that once exclusively Southern confection, Krispy Kreme doughnuts.

I now get my hair cut at the same worldwide chain that I've patronized in Gainesville, Fla., and Sheridan, Wyo. A short drive to Tempe and I can purchase my gourmet frozen dinners at the same Trader Joe's where I've shopped in Silicon Valley and on Long Island, and I pick up organic produce at the same Whole Foods Market I've patronized in South Florida, as well as in the suburbs of Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia. Although I subscribe to a different local paper here, I also continue to get home delivery of The New York Times.

Adjusting to life here was a snap. After all, not only did I already own a pair of Arizona jeans and regularly consume AriZona Iced Tea (the diet green variety, mostly), but when I lived in Manhattan in the 1980s, I'd eaten at the fabulously fashionable Arizona 206. In our global economy, what more needs to be done? After all, on Planet Consumer, whatever is unique to a region is reduced to mere buyable kitsch - like the saguaro-shaped pencils on sale at the local Walgreens.

But if you're expecting a lecture filled with terms like "soulless interchangeability," "unremitting déjà vu," and "sterile artifice," you won't get it from me. The sameness is exactly what I love about my part of Arizona. I like the fact that the only way I can tell I am entering a new neighborhood is when the fast-food outlets and chain stores start to repeat themselves. To a guy who's moved around as much as I have, the uniformity represents stability. The conformity makes me comfortable.

Of course it wasn't simply a familiar environment I craved. An important reason I chose to move to Phoenix was its diversity. Before coming here, I looked at Valley phone directories to check for ample numbers of Patels and Nguyens, Rodriguezes and Changs. I need a place where supermarkets carry kimchi and kasha, quinoa and collard greens, platanos y boniatos. Where there is a large enough gay community to accommodate lesbian Scrabble leagues, gay Realtors councils, and bitter longstanding feuds. Where there are synagogues representing all major branches of Judaism, including atheism. Where I can find an Ethiopian restaurant, Caribbean music, Iranian movies, an active Green Party and local punk and hip-hop scenes.

When a childhood friend from Brooklyn, who is Sikh, informed me that within a few blocks of her Coronado district home there were two different gurudwaras, I knew the Valley had the diversity I wanted.

Whatever natural beauty Arizona has to offer is not evident in my daily life. It would probably be lost on me if it were. Having grown up in New York City, I would not care if the whole world were paved over.

My formative years occurred in an environment not altogether different from the "non-place urban realm" of Sun Belt suburbia. Our house was in a remote part of Brooklyn, a 15-minute drive to the nearest subway stop; an hour's trip to Manhattan was always called "going to the city." We had a backyard swimming pool, and I was eager to learn to drive as soon as possible.

Although our neighborhood did leave me with a sensibility equidistant between that of Seinfeld and The Sopranos, it was also a neighborhood that didn't have a name until the 1970 opening of Kings Plaza, the Big Apple's first enclosed mall, just a three-block walk from our house. It featured the same anchor department stores I can find at Fiesta Mall.

Although I loved living in Manhattan as an adult, my annual visits confirm that even that quintessential urban locale is morphing into something else. The sleazy but vibrant honky-tonk of Times Square has been replaced by an environment as safe and artificial as Main Street in Walt Disney World. Other once-distinctive neighborhoods are looking more and more like everywhere else as they are invaded by the same chain stores all around me in Mesa.

Three years ago, in order to write a new book, I left a job as an attorney in Gainesville - where I lived off an interstate highway exit in a garden apartment across the street from a series of power centers complete with the mandatory Albertsons, Barnes & Noble, Wal-Mart, Home Depot, T.G.I. Friday's, and Red Lobster. For a while I lived at artists' colonies and mooched off suburban friends, mostly women I knew from my 1970s undergraduate days and their tolerant husbands. In exchange for being a charming conversationalist and doing such genuinely enjoyable tasks as picking up dry cleaning and dinner sushi, looking in on elderly grandparents at nursing homes, walking Yorkshire terriers, and accompanying third-graders on class field trips, I got a spare bedroom ("the Lincoln bedroom," my friend Nina calls it) or a futon in the den. I did my writing at Burger Kings and Borders bookstores across Power Center Nation.

The artists' colonies - Villa Montalvo, the Ucross Foundation, the Ragdale Foundation - generously gave me the luxury of time and a room of my own to write. While I enjoyed being close to such fine examples of the natural world as the foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains, the majestic landscape of Wyoming's high plains, and one of the last pieces of pristine prairie in the suburbs of Chicago, I often found myself abandoning nature in favor of the coffee bars of Silicon Valley, the McDonald's counter at the Wal-Mart in Sheridan, or the food court in the Northbrook Mall - places where I would sit with my iced tea or Diet Coke and scribble away to my heart's desire. The truth is I did my best work in these palaces of conspicuous consumption. Writing about American culture circa Y2K, I need bland commercial conformity for inspiration.

Arizona provides me with more than enough inspiration.

So I am happy to be an Arizonan. For now.

Like many other state residents, I don't expect to be living here for the rest of my life. On the other hand, I'll probably be moving to a place that looks just about the same.